Friday 22 May 2015

Wrong person hampered progress

The new wing of the Lalit Kala Akademi in Lucknow
It is so easy to blame the government for all the ills that befall us but in the name of autonomy the reins of institutions shouldn’t also be handed over to self-serving, arbitrary and avaricious individuals. The whole point of granting autonomy to those institutions is that they are so significant that they need to work independent of narrow interests. If we choose thieves as chowkidars, who are we to blame? 
The case in point is the unending saga of Lalit Kala Akademi. I attempted to update myself on what was happening there and I yet again stumbled on the proverbial can of worms. I am not surprised that the Ministry of Culture had to sit up and take notice but hopefully the wrongs will soon be righted. I am pained about how choosing a wrong person can set an institution back so badly. Let me start at the beginning.
The problems started when they chose a tainted and relatively junior bureaucrat (he retired as joint secretary) like Ashok Vajpayee as chairman of LKA. Except his association with S.H. Raza and writing a few desultory catalogue notes I wonder what the locus was for him being appointed to the august body. During his five-year tenure he allegedly played his predictable favourites to dole out whatever benefits could accrue from the LKA, including giving the galleries gratis to commercial galleries during the Commonwealth Games despite noting on the files to the contrary. This resulted in huge loss to the public exchequer, which by the way is yet to be recovered. 

In the last month of his tenure, he even threw out the secretary of the LKA ostensibly for “not holding the triennial” among a few unproven allegations but the actual agenda was that Vajpayee was interested in another term as chairman. The then ministry mandarins scrapped the orders and the Secretary, Dr Sudhakar Sharma was back in harness. In the intermittent period until the appointment of the new chairman, the vice chairman K.R. Subbanna took over and peace reigned. But it was not to be.
It is rumoured that Ashok Vajpayee lobbied and got K.K. Chakravarty the hot seat to put a veil on his own wrongdoings further his “half-finished” work. While Chakravarty managed to wangle prestigious postings at Manav Sangrahalaya, Bhopal, National Museum, Indira Gandhi Center for Arts and Delhi Institute of Heritage Research and Management in Delhi, unfortunately there are many CVC or CBI investigations on him, including financial mismanagement. Incidentally salary paid to him was in violation of the provisions of the constitution of the DIHRM, registered under the Societies Registration Act – as it was an honorary post.
At LKA he carved a room within a room to carry on the work of DIHRM. Reliable sources in the LKA allege that he took away a truck load of files when the government took over. In the absence of secretary, vice chairman, general council and executive board, he not only conducted all the executive functions of the Akademi but was also involved in its day-to-day functioning, which is not the role defined for the LKA chairman.
Even before he joined the LKA, Chakravarty again threw out the secretary. This is really suspicious for I have been following Dr Sharma’s career almost for the last three decades in institutions like National Museum, National Gallery of Modern Art and of course the Lalit Kala Akademi and I am happy to report that his track record is actually unblemished, a fact borne out in subsequent enquiries by his detractors, so much so that they were left with little option but to drop the charges on him in court. 
The focus on development of LKA’s infrastructure in Delhi including creating a new wing comprising of a large gallery space, an auditorium, and the administrative wing during Dr Sharma’s tenure was carried out with space carved for storage and putting the library in order. 
He went about creating a new wing at the Lucknow regional centre and put in place LKA’s new branch in the historical landmark Gaiety Theatre of Shimla and publication outlets at Kochi and Srimanta Sankaradeva Kalakshetra in Guwahati with almost missionary zeal!
His efforts paid off literally and metaphorically as revenue earnings shot up from the initial Rs 10 lakh to Rs 1 crore per annum.
But this poor officer was forced to take legal recourse and even after abatement of the charge sheet and winning the case in court is still in the process of getting reinstated and join office, for even despite ministerial orders Chakravarty went ahead and ridiculed the quasi-judicial order by stalling its implementation and also made a mockery of the Central Administrative Tribunal and law of the land for this is contempt of court. Hopefully inquires will be initiated against Vajpayee and Chakravarty under government rule and Dr Sharma’s harassment at the hands of the former chairmen will come to an end and justice will not be delayed – remember the old adage?
Recently I happened to re-read the wonderful lines by Winston Churchill when asked to cut arts funding in favour of the war effort, he simply replied: “Then what are we fighting for?” My point exactly.

Thursday 7 May 2015

At Lalit Kala Akademi, paintings lose out to the art of the possible

When a painting by the internationally renowned Ram Kumar went missing from the Lalit Kala Akademi and was replaced with a fake in 2003, the art fraternity was shocked. As more paintings have gone missing down the years since, successive governments seem to have been least bothered. 
With the Modi government taking over the affairs of the akademi, the case of the missing paintings appears all but forgotten. A Comptroller and Auditor-General report of 2011-2013 said 14 works of art were missing from the Akademi. “Out of this, nine art works had been missing since 1984, but the Akademi did not take any initiative to trace out the same or fix responsibility,” the report said. 
The Akademi had not maintained any record of movement of the permanent collection prior to August 2013, it said. In 2010-11, when the Akademi transferred some 400 art works to a regional centre, 17 were damaged because they were not handled by a professional agency. The report said the missing paintings were not written off the record even if they were untraceable. No FIR appears to have been lodged or any enquiry committee formed.


Panel’s findings
Nearly 10 years ago, a four-member expert committee was formed to review and authenticate the art works. The committee reported missing Landscape by Ram Kumar, Tandava by J. Swaminathan, Peace by K.K. Hebbar, Monkey God by M.F. Husain, Indian Traditional Girl by I. Jayachandran and two paintings by Somnath Hore. 

The committee authenticated 2,000 works, but seriously questioned the authenticity of 12. The panel could not verify if these were genuine. The work stopped suddenly and resumed in 2007. The paintings continue to be listed as missing. 
The case of the missing paintings forms the essence of a letter written by Ramakrishna Vedala, secretary in charge of the Akademi, in 2013 to the Central Bureau of Investigation. But nothing much happened after that. 

Artists question wisdom of removing Akademi chairperson 
Even as the Lalit Kala Akademi finds itself in the news for reasons other than art, there is a fear that priceless paintings missing from it might have found their way into private galleries. 
What is now grabbing headlines is the government’s sudden takeover of the autonomous Akademi and a group of artists contesting the move in the Delhi High Court. The court had issued notice to the Union government asking why the takeover should not be quashed and a CBI inquiry initiated into the affairs of the Akademi. It is hoped that the court will look into the case of the missing paintings that find a mention in the papers submitted for its scrutiny. 
The artists have questioned the government’s wisdom of removing Kalyan Kumar Chakravarty as Akademi Chairperson. Sources say he has taken several steps to clean up the Akademi and rid it of politics. “He was actually in the process of setting the place in order and his removal comes as a shock,” an Akademi member said. Mr. Chakravarty’s tenure should have lasted till 2017. 
Sources blame a former secretary for mismanagement of the Akademi’s affairs, a charge he denies. While the government has cited financial and administrative irregularities as reasons for the takeover, no one, it appears, has paid any attention to the paintings that have gone missing for long.
(Source: The Hindu, 2 May 2015)